Customers who have purchased Truvia Natural Sweetener between July 1, 2008 and July 24, 2014 can claim into the Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement on TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com to get cash refund or vouchers.
Many people throughout the United States use Truvia Natural Sweeteners thinking that they are made with all natural ingredients. But they will be shocked to know that those sweeteners actually contain highly processed ingredients instead of natural. If you have purchased the Truvia Natural Sweetener (packet, spoonable jar and baking blend forms) for household or personal use between July 1, 2008 and July 24, 2014, then you are eligible to get cash refund or vouchers from the Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement.
Two class action lawsuits (Denise Howerton, et al. v. Cargill, Inc. and Molly Martin and Lauren Barry v. Cargill, Inc.) were filed against Cargill claiming that it misled customers by marketing its Truvia consumer products as “natural”. According to plaintiffs, the Truvia Natural Sweeteners are not natural as they contain highly processed ingredients and/or ingredients derived from GMOs (genetically modified organisms).
They further claimed that the descriptions of products were inaccurate or misleading. Thus, the company violated consumer protection laws and the breach-of-warranty laws of various states (Minnesota, California, Hawaii, and Florida). Cargill denies all these allegations but agreed to pay $5 million to settle these class action lawsuits. The company will also make certain changes to the labels of its Truvia Natural Sweetener products.
Class member must complete and submit a claim form before December 5, 2014 in order to get compensation from the settlement. You can easily submit the claim form online at TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com; email at mail@TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com or via mail to Truvia Settlement Administrator, c/o Dahl Administration, PO Box 3614, Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614.
All the eligible class members will get benefits on the basis of the number and type or value of the Truvia Natural Sweetener products they purchased. They will get cash refund up to $45 or up to $90 Vouchers for free Truvia Natural Sweetener products via mail after the court approves the Settlement on final hearing.
Link to submit claim form online: TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com
Link to download copy of claim form: TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com
Address to submit a claim form:
Truvia Settlement Administrator
c/o Dahl Administration
PO Box 3614
Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614
Email address to submit the claim form: mail@TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com
Claims must be postmarked by: December 5, 2014
Potential Award: up to $45 Cash refund or up to $90 Vouchers for free Truvia Natural Sweetener products
Final Hearing: October 27, 2014
Claims Administrator
Truvia Settlement Administrator
c/o Dahl Administration
P.O. Box 3614
Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614
1-888-512-0492
mail@TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com
Class Counsel
Clayton D. Halunen
Melissa W. Wolchansky
HALUNEN & ASSOCIATES
Michael R. Reese
REESE RICHMAN LLP
Joseph P. Guglielmo
SCOTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP
Defense Counsel
Jan M. Conlin
ROBINS KAPLAN MILLER & CIRESI LLP
Many people throughout the United States use Truvia Natural Sweeteners thinking that they are made with all natural ingredients. But they will be shocked to know that those sweeteners actually contain highly processed ingredients instead of natural. If you have purchased the Truvia Natural Sweetener (packet, spoonable jar and baking blend forms) for household or personal use between July 1, 2008 and July 24, 2014, then you are eligible to get cash refund or vouchers from the Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement.
Two class action lawsuits (Denise Howerton, et al. v. Cargill, Inc. and Molly Martin and Lauren Barry v. Cargill, Inc.) were filed against Cargill claiming that it misled customers by marketing its Truvia consumer products as “natural”. According to plaintiffs, the Truvia Natural Sweeteners are not natural as they contain highly processed ingredients and/or ingredients derived from GMOs (genetically modified organisms).
They further claimed that the descriptions of products were inaccurate or misleading. Thus, the company violated consumer protection laws and the breach-of-warranty laws of various states (Minnesota, California, Hawaii, and Florida). Cargill denies all these allegations but agreed to pay $5 million to settle these class action lawsuits. The company will also make certain changes to the labels of its Truvia Natural Sweetener products.
Class member must complete and submit a claim form before December 5, 2014 in order to get compensation from the settlement. You can easily submit the claim form online at TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com; email at mail@TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com or via mail to Truvia Settlement Administrator, c/o Dahl Administration, PO Box 3614, Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614.
All the eligible class members will get benefits on the basis of the number and type or value of the Truvia Natural Sweetener products they purchased. They will get cash refund up to $45 or up to $90 Vouchers for free Truvia Natural Sweetener products via mail after the court approves the Settlement on final hearing.
Highlights of Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement
Website of Settlement: TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.comLink to submit claim form online: TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com
Link to download copy of claim form: TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com
Address to submit a claim form:
Truvia Settlement Administrator
c/o Dahl Administration
PO Box 3614
Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614
Email address to submit the claim form: mail@TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com
Claims must be postmarked by: December 5, 2014
Potential Award: up to $45 Cash refund or up to $90 Vouchers for free Truvia Natural Sweetener products
Final Hearing: October 27, 2014
Claims Administrator
Truvia Settlement Administrator
c/o Dahl Administration
P.O. Box 3614
Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614
1-888-512-0492
mail@TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com
Class Counsel
Clayton D. Halunen
Melissa W. Wolchansky
HALUNEN & ASSOCIATES
Michael R. Reese
REESE RICHMAN LLP
Joseph P. Guglielmo
SCOTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP
Defense Counsel
Jan M. Conlin
ROBINS KAPLAN MILLER & CIRESI LLP
No comments:
Post a Comment