Settlement Info blog gives info about latest class action lawsuit settlements currently in news. Learn to claim and settle to get back your refund on settlements.
Showing posts with label Health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health. Show all posts
Friday, May 1, 2015
Thursday, April 30, 2015
Nestle Purina Missouri Dog Treat Settlement
All Missouri residents who purchased Waggin’ Train or Canyon Creek Ranch Dog Treat product can visit MissouriDogTreatSettlement.com to claim reimbursement from the proposed Settlement.

Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Capital and Magellan Act 106 Settlement
If you are eligible, claim your file at Act106Settlement.com to get benefits up to $50,000 in the Capital and Magellan Act 106 Settlement.
A settlement has been arrived at in two class action suits. The plaintiffs in the class action claims that Capital BlueCross and Magellan Health Services failed to follow the Pennsylvania law as described in Act 106 of 1989. The law is about the coverage and payment for certain non-hospital residential drug and alcohol addiction treatment, up to the maximum number of days defined, whenever the medical need for that treatment is certified in writing by a patient’s treating physician or psychologist.
The defendants have denied any unlawful activity but agreed to settle the class action lawsuits. The settlement was preliminarily approved on Nov. 14, 2014.
There are two Classes who are eligible for the class action settlement. They are the Subscriber Class and the Provider Class.
Subscriber Class: All the capital subscribers who received non-hospital residential addiction treatment between 12/22/2004 and 11/14/2014 through the following types of health plans: CHIP, a non-ERISA Capital ASO group plan for which Capital offers administrative services only for non-hospital residential addiction treatment, a Capital fully insured group plan not subject to ERISA.
Provider Class: All licensed Pennsylvania non-hospital residential addiction treatment facilities that provided non-hospital residential addiction treatment between 12/22/2006 and 11/14/2014 to a Capital subscriber through the following types of health plans: CHIP, a non-ERISA Capital ASO Group, or a Capital fully insured group plan not subject to ERISA
Following are the benefits you will get under this settlement:
1) Payment for certain expenses of non-hospital residential addiction treatment to Capital’s subscribers under non-ERISA fully insured group plan products, non-ERISA ASO group plan products, and CHIP.
2) The establishment of a Scholarship Fund for non-hospital residential addiction treatment, to benefit youngsters who are under the age of 18 years in the 21-county area in central Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley that Capital Services
3) The appointment of an independent Compliance Person to monitor the compliance of Defendants for a period of five years, funded by the Capital Defendants at up to $10,000 per year.
The settlement provides that Defendants shall pay a total $1,400,000 for the relief describe above, plus for any attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigations costs and with up to $50,000 in total incentive awards to the named Plaintiffs.
How to file a claim for Capital and Magellan Act 106 Settlement?
To get benefits from this settlement you have to fill out a claim form. Visit at www.Act106Settlement.com site to get claim form. Fill out the claim form and send it before the deadline date.
Settlement Website: www.Act106Settlement.com
Claim Form Deadline: March 16, 2015
Link to Claim Form: www.Act106Settlement.com
Final Hearing: January 30, 2015
Claims Administrator
Gregory B. Heller
Young Ricchiuti Caldwell & Heller, LLC
1600 Market Street
Suite 3800
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(267) 546-1004
Jonathan Auerbach
Jerome M. Marcus
Marcus & Auerbach LLC
101 Greenwood Avenue
Suite 310
Jenkintown, PA 19046
(215) 885-2250
You may also contact your lawyers at Act106Settlement@ConsumerSettlement.org.
Class Counsel
Jonathan Auerbach
Jerome M. Marcus
MARCUS & AUERBACH LLC
Gregory B. Heller
YOUNG RICCHIUTI CALDWELL & HELLER LLC
Defense Counsel
Matthew J. Siembieda
Franco A. Corrado
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Jayson R. Wolfgang
Jan. L. Budman II
BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
A settlement has been arrived at in two class action suits. The plaintiffs in the class action claims that Capital BlueCross and Magellan Health Services failed to follow the Pennsylvania law as described in Act 106 of 1989. The law is about the coverage and payment for certain non-hospital residential drug and alcohol addiction treatment, up to the maximum number of days defined, whenever the medical need for that treatment is certified in writing by a patient’s treating physician or psychologist.
The defendants have denied any unlawful activity but agreed to settle the class action lawsuits. The settlement was preliminarily approved on Nov. 14, 2014.
Who is Eligible?
There are two Classes who are eligible for the class action settlement. They are the Subscriber Class and the Provider Class.
Subscriber Class: All the capital subscribers who received non-hospital residential addiction treatment between 12/22/2004 and 11/14/2014 through the following types of health plans: CHIP, a non-ERISA Capital ASO group plan for which Capital offers administrative services only for non-hospital residential addiction treatment, a Capital fully insured group plan not subject to ERISA.
Provider Class: All licensed Pennsylvania non-hospital residential addiction treatment facilities that provided non-hospital residential addiction treatment between 12/22/2006 and 11/14/2014 to a Capital subscriber through the following types of health plans: CHIP, a non-ERISA Capital ASO Group, or a Capital fully insured group plan not subject to ERISA
Following are the benefits you will get under this settlement:
1) Payment for certain expenses of non-hospital residential addiction treatment to Capital’s subscribers under non-ERISA fully insured group plan products, non-ERISA ASO group plan products, and CHIP.
2) The establishment of a Scholarship Fund for non-hospital residential addiction treatment, to benefit youngsters who are under the age of 18 years in the 21-county area in central Pennsylvania and the Lehigh Valley that Capital Services
3) The appointment of an independent Compliance Person to monitor the compliance of Defendants for a period of five years, funded by the Capital Defendants at up to $10,000 per year.
The settlement provides that Defendants shall pay a total $1,400,000 for the relief describe above, plus for any attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigations costs and with up to $50,000 in total incentive awards to the named Plaintiffs.
How to file a claim for Capital and Magellan Act 106 Settlement?
To get benefits from this settlement you have to fill out a claim form. Visit at www.Act106Settlement.com site to get claim form. Fill out the claim form and send it before the deadline date.
Act 106 Settlement Highlights:
Settlement Website: www.Act106Settlement.com
Claim Form Deadline: March 16, 2015
Link to Claim Form: www.Act106Settlement.com
Final Hearing: January 30, 2015
Claims Administrator
Gregory B. Heller
Young Ricchiuti Caldwell & Heller, LLC
1600 Market Street
Suite 3800
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(267) 546-1004
Jonathan Auerbach
Jerome M. Marcus
Marcus & Auerbach LLC
101 Greenwood Avenue
Suite 310
Jenkintown, PA 19046
(215) 885-2250
You may also contact your lawyers at Act106Settlement@ConsumerSettlement.org.
Class Counsel
Jonathan Auerbach
Jerome M. Marcus
MARCUS & AUERBACH LLC
Gregory B. Heller
YOUNG RICCHIUTI CALDWELL & HELLER LLC
Defense Counsel
Matthew J. Siembieda
Franco A. Corrado
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Jayson R. Wolfgang
Jan. L. Budman II
BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC
Thursday, January 29, 2015
Soft White Wheat Settlement over Wheat Litigation
Friday, December 12, 2014
Carter-Reed Relacore Settlement for False Advertising
Claim Relacore False Advertising Class Action Settlement on CarterReedSettlement.com to get monetary benefits of up to $28.
Reducing stubborn belly fat is not an easy task. So people try supplements to get rid of it. U.S. residents who used Relacore belly-fat reduction and weight loss supplements between January 1, 2000 and November 10, 2014 will be shocked to know there is no scientific proof that the product helps reduce stress-related belly fat. Class members can get cash benefits from the Relacore False Advertising Class Action Settlement.
Reducing stubborn belly fat is not an easy task. So people try supplements to get rid of it. U.S. residents who used Relacore belly-fat reduction and weight loss supplements between January 1, 2000 and November 10, 2014 will be shocked to know there is no scientific proof that the product helps reduce stress-related belly fat. Class members can get cash benefits from the Relacore False Advertising Class Action Settlement.
Friday, December 5, 2014
Nestle & Waggin Dog Treat Products Settlement
Pet lovers… you can claim online for Nestle & Waggin Dog Treat Settlement at DogTreatProductsSettlement.com, if your dog was harmed by eating Waggin’ Train or Canyon Creek Ranch dog treat products.
Two dozen pet owners sued Nestle Purina PetCare Co. and Waggin’ Train LLC, claiming that animals were injured or killed by eating chicken its jerky treats. It is claimed that Waggin’ Train or Canyon Creek Ranch dog treat products imported from or containing ingredients from China were defective even some pets become sick and/or die after consuming the products. But Food and Drug Administration officials said that despite extensive testing, they couldn't pinpoint any cause. The settlement still has to be approved by a judge; Nestle Purina PetCare Co. and Waggin’ Train LLC have agreed to create a $6.5 million cash fund for owner expenses. If you think your animal was harmed, visit DogTreatProductsSettlement.com, and get the complete details to submit claims online for monetary relief.
Many brands of the jerky strips, nuggets and other products have been linked to deaths of more than 1,000 dogs and more than 4,800 complaints of pet illness. Several lawsuits were filed against Nestlé Purina PetCare Company and Waggin’ Train, LLC alleged that Dog Treat Products were defective and may have caused pets to become ill or die.
Two dozen pet owners sued Nestle Purina PetCare Co. and Waggin’ Train LLC, claiming that animals were injured or killed by eating chicken its jerky treats. It is claimed that Waggin’ Train or Canyon Creek Ranch dog treat products imported from or containing ingredients from China were defective even some pets become sick and/or die after consuming the products. But Food and Drug Administration officials said that despite extensive testing, they couldn't pinpoint any cause. The settlement still has to be approved by a judge; Nestle Purina PetCare Co. and Waggin’ Train LLC have agreed to create a $6.5 million cash fund for owner expenses. If you think your animal was harmed, visit DogTreatProductsSettlement.com, and get the complete details to submit claims online for monetary relief.
Many brands of the jerky strips, nuggets and other products have been linked to deaths of more than 1,000 dogs and more than 4,800 complaints of pet illness. Several lawsuits were filed against Nestlé Purina PetCare Company and Waggin’ Train, LLC alleged that Dog Treat Products were defective and may have caused pets to become ill or die.
Monday, November 24, 2014
Madenlian V Flax Milk Settlement for artificial ingredients
Get your money refund at FlaxMilkSettlement.com for Flax USA flax milk products that have synthetic ingredients in it yet claim and sell as “all natural”.
Flax milk is best option for people who are on diet. It has only 25 calories and zero saturated fat. Flax USA Inc. is well known company that provides 100% natural flax milk to customers. But company has recently come across the lawsuit due to presence of artificial ingredients in the flax milk product that company claim as all natural. If you have also purchased flax milk of Flax USA, then participate into the Madenlian V Flax Milk Settlement to get refund.
Flax milk is best option for people who are on diet. It has only 25 calories and zero saturated fat. Flax USA Inc. is well known company that provides 100% natural flax milk to customers. But company has recently come across the lawsuit due to presence of artificial ingredients in the flax milk product that company claim as all natural. If you have also purchased flax milk of Flax USA, then participate into the Madenlian V Flax Milk Settlement to get refund.
Saturday, November 22, 2014
OxyElite Pro, Jack3d, VERSA-1 USPLabs Class Action Settlement
If you bought the USPlabs Products (OxyElite Pro, Jack3d, VERSA-1) since August 17, 2012, then you may get cash benefits from the Settlement at USPlabsClassAction.com.
During the past few years, false advertising related class action lawsuits are rising at an alarming pace. False advertising class action lawsuits have filed against many companies and brands. Recently, USPlabs and GNC have come across the class action due to false advertising their dietary supplement products named OxyElite Pro, Jack3d and VERSA-1. USPlabs and GNC (Defendants) have agreed to pay $2 million for putting an end to a class-action lawsuit.
During the past few years, false advertising related class action lawsuits are rising at an alarming pace. False advertising class action lawsuits have filed against many companies and brands. Recently, USPlabs and GNC have come across the class action due to false advertising their dietary supplement products named OxyElite Pro, Jack3d and VERSA-1. USPlabs and GNC (Defendants) have agreed to pay $2 million for putting an end to a class-action lawsuit.
Friday, November 7, 2014
How to get refund in FTC LeanSpa Settlement Over Alleged Deceptive Claims?
Individuals who are cheated with Leanspa weight loss supplements with the name of free trial can get refund into the FTC LeanSpa Settlement at FTC.gov/LeanSpa.
Fat people always try out every method and tricks that other people give them about loosing weight without thinking for a bit. This kind of madness or eagerness to loose weight may leads them to being cheated by different company products that claims to reduce weight naturally and easily. Recently LeanSpa has also come across the class action due to fake advertisement of their weight loss product.
Fat people always try out every method and tricks that other people give them about loosing weight without thinking for a bit. This kind of madness or eagerness to loose weight may leads them to being cheated by different company products that claims to reduce weight naturally and easily. Recently LeanSpa has also come across the class action due to fake advertisement of their weight loss product.
Friday, October 31, 2014
Flax Milk Settlement over false Natural Advertise
Claim Flax USA Flax Milk Class Action Lawsuit Settlement on FlaxMilkSettlement.com to get monetary benefits from the settlement.
Flax USA is the newest target in the wave of false and misleading advertising class-action lawsuits over “all-natural” claims. The company has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit by providing monetary benefits to class members. People who bought flax milk sold in 32-oz size cartons (unsweetened, vanilla and original flavors) in the United States between November 5, 2009 and September 22, 2014 are eligible class members of the Flax USA Flax Milk Class Action Lawsuit Settlement.
Flax USA is the newest target in the wave of false and misleading advertising class-action lawsuits over “all-natural” claims. The company has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit by providing monetary benefits to class members. People who bought flax milk sold in 32-oz size cartons (unsweetened, vanilla and original flavors) in the United States between November 5, 2009 and September 22, 2014 are eligible class members of the Flax USA Flax Milk Class Action Lawsuit Settlement.
Friday, October 10, 2014
U-Prosta Settlement over FDA Disapproval
If you purchased U-Prosta during the time period of April 13, 2010 to March 16, 2011, then claim for U-Prosta Class Action Settlement on uprostasettlement.com to get benefits.
People using U-Prosta dietary supplement could get benefits from a class action settlement with USA Far Ocean Group. USA Far Ocean Group has already conducted a nationwide recall of U-Prosta in 2011. Now, the company will refund money to consumers who purchased U-Prosta in California between April 13, 2010 and March 16, 2011, as a part of U-Prosta Class Action Settlement over false advertisement. Class members have to submit a claim form to get benefits from the settlement.
People using U-Prosta dietary supplement could get benefits from a class action settlement with USA Far Ocean Group. USA Far Ocean Group has already conducted a nationwide recall of U-Prosta in 2011. Now, the company will refund money to consumers who purchased U-Prosta in California between April 13, 2010 and March 16, 2011, as a part of U-Prosta Class Action Settlement over false advertisement. Class members have to submit a claim form to get benefits from the settlement.
Friday, September 26, 2014
How to claim C-8 Medical Monitoring Program Settlement?
Monday, September 22, 2014
How to claim for Pediatric Antidepressant Missouri Settlement?
Friday, September 12, 2014
How to claim Skelaxin class action settlement?
Monday, September 1, 2014
Yaz Lawsuit Settlement website Yazlawsuit.com started
If you suffered serious side effects after taking the Yaz birth control pill, you may have a legal right to pursue compensation. Visit Yazlawsuit.com for lawsuit settlement details.
Yaz and Yasmin are two of the most popular birth control pills of all time and are used by millions of women worldwide. But unfortunately, new research and studies have found that these drugs may cause an increased risk of blood clots, which in turn can lead to some serious conditions like stroke, pulmonary embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT). The FDA has also received many adverse reports of injuries and death following the use of the drug.
Thousands of women, who have been injured by these defective drugs, have filed a lawsuit against the drug maker, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals. Although the company has denied any wrongdoing, they’re settling these lawsuits by giving monetary compensation to sufferers. In fact, Bayer has settled 8,250 cases for an amount of $1.7 billion by March 2014. Still, thousands of cases are pending and Bayer has confirmed that it will continue settling individual lawsuits on a case-be-case basis. So, all those who have suffered or are suffering from side effects of the drug are encouraged to file a Yaz lawsuit and receive deserved financial compensation.
Yaz and Yasmin are two of the most popular birth control pills of all time and are used by millions of women worldwide. But unfortunately, new research and studies have found that these drugs may cause an increased risk of blood clots, which in turn can lead to some serious conditions like stroke, pulmonary embolism and Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT). The FDA has also received many adverse reports of injuries and death following the use of the drug.
Thousands of women, who have been injured by these defective drugs, have filed a lawsuit against the drug maker, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals. Although the company has denied any wrongdoing, they’re settling these lawsuits by giving monetary compensation to sufferers. In fact, Bayer has settled 8,250 cases for an amount of $1.7 billion by March 2014. Still, thousands of cases are pending and Bayer has confirmed that it will continue settling individual lawsuits on a case-be-case basis. So, all those who have suffered or are suffering from side effects of the drug are encouraged to file a Yaz lawsuit and receive deserved financial compensation.
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
How to claim Perrigo Glucosamine Settlement?
Check out Glucosamine products list in Perrigo Glucosamine false advertising settlement to claim complete money back at perrigoglucosaminesettlement.com.
Customers of Glucosamine have filed a case against Walgreen, Wal-Mart, Supervalue and also the Perrigo Company of South Carolina for selling glucosamine product with fake labels. If you have also purchased glucosamine product from above mentioned retail stores between November 1, 2005 and August 1, 2014, then you can claim your compensation into the Perrigo Glucosamine false advertising class action settlement.
As per the allegations of class members, Walgreen, Wal-Mart Stores, Supervalu, and Perrigo Company of South Carolina have sold the products that claim to contain glucosamine and/or chondroitin. These ingredients help to rebuild cartilage, lubricate joints, and improve joint comfort. But unfortunately product sold by retailers do not contain the glucosamine and/or chondroitin for any benefits as per mentioned. So, companies have violated the consumer protection laws by misguiding the consumers.
Customers of Glucosamine have filed a case against Walgreen, Wal-Mart, Supervalue and also the Perrigo Company of South Carolina for selling glucosamine product with fake labels. If you have also purchased glucosamine product from above mentioned retail stores between November 1, 2005 and August 1, 2014, then you can claim your compensation into the Perrigo Glucosamine false advertising class action settlement.
As per the allegations of class members, Walgreen, Wal-Mart Stores, Supervalu, and Perrigo Company of South Carolina have sold the products that claim to contain glucosamine and/or chondroitin. These ingredients help to rebuild cartilage, lubricate joints, and improve joint comfort. But unfortunately product sold by retailers do not contain the glucosamine and/or chondroitin for any benefits as per mentioned. So, companies have violated the consumer protection laws by misguiding the consumers.
Labels:
Drugs/Medical,
false advertising,
Health,
Media/Telecom
Saturday, August 16, 2014
Pfizer Neurontin Settlement for misleading advertisement
Claim Neurontin Third-Party Payor Class Action Settlement on NeurontinSettlement.com as Pfizer and Warner-Lambert have settled a class-action lawsuit over misleading advertisement.
After over 10 years of hard-fought litigation, Pfizer and Warner-Lambert have agreed to end the consumer fraud class action lawsuit over the sale & marketing of the Neurontin (gabapentin) by paying $325 million into a Settlement Fund. People who purchased this pharmaceutical companies’ prescription drug during the proxy period of January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004 can get cash refund from the Neurontin Third-Party Payor Class Action Settlement.
After over 10 years of hard-fought litigation, Pfizer and Warner-Lambert have agreed to end the consumer fraud class action lawsuit over the sale & marketing of the Neurontin (gabapentin) by paying $325 million into a Settlement Fund. People who purchased this pharmaceutical companies’ prescription drug during the proxy period of January 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004 can get cash refund from the Neurontin Third-Party Payor Class Action Settlement.
Friday, August 15, 2014
Truvia Sweetener Lawsuit Settlement over false-advertising
Customers who have purchased Truvia Natural Sweetener between July 1, 2008 and July 24, 2014 can claim into the Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement on TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com to get cash refund or vouchers.
Many people throughout the United States use Truvia Natural Sweeteners thinking that they are made with all natural ingredients. But they will be shocked to know that those sweeteners actually contain highly processed ingredients instead of natural. If you have purchased the Truvia Natural Sweetener (packet, spoonable jar and baking blend forms) for household or personal use between July 1, 2008 and July 24, 2014, then you are eligible to get cash refund or vouchers from the Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement.
Two class action lawsuits (Denise Howerton, et al. v. Cargill, Inc. and Molly Martin and Lauren Barry v. Cargill, Inc.) were filed against Cargill claiming that it misled customers by marketing its Truvia consumer products as “natural”. According to plaintiffs, the Truvia Natural Sweeteners are not natural as they contain highly processed ingredients and/or ingredients derived from GMOs (genetically modified organisms).
They further claimed that the descriptions of products were inaccurate or misleading. Thus, the company violated consumer protection laws and the breach-of-warranty laws of various states (Minnesota, California, Hawaii, and Florida). Cargill denies all these allegations but agreed to pay $5 million to settle these class action lawsuits. The company will also make certain changes to the labels of its Truvia Natural Sweetener products.
Many people throughout the United States use Truvia Natural Sweeteners thinking that they are made with all natural ingredients. But they will be shocked to know that those sweeteners actually contain highly processed ingredients instead of natural. If you have purchased the Truvia Natural Sweetener (packet, spoonable jar and baking blend forms) for household or personal use between July 1, 2008 and July 24, 2014, then you are eligible to get cash refund or vouchers from the Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement.
Two class action lawsuits (Denise Howerton, et al. v. Cargill, Inc. and Molly Martin and Lauren Barry v. Cargill, Inc.) were filed against Cargill claiming that it misled customers by marketing its Truvia consumer products as “natural”. According to plaintiffs, the Truvia Natural Sweeteners are not natural as they contain highly processed ingredients and/or ingredients derived from GMOs (genetically modified organisms).
They further claimed that the descriptions of products were inaccurate or misleading. Thus, the company violated consumer protection laws and the breach-of-warranty laws of various states (Minnesota, California, Hawaii, and Florida). Cargill denies all these allegations but agreed to pay $5 million to settle these class action lawsuits. The company will also make certain changes to the labels of its Truvia Natural Sweetener products.
Friday, June 6, 2014
Claim Refund of NuvaRing Settlement on nuvaringofficialsettlement.com
Everyone who has suffered from health issues due to fatal NuvaRing contraceptive use can file claim at nuvaringofficialsettlement.com to get refund.
Many contraceptive pills are available in the market that helps you to stay away from unwanted pregnancies. But sometimes these contraceptive pills have fatal side effects that trigger your health and your potency. NuvaRing contraceptive Settlement has recently approved by U.S. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel of St. Louis as majority of the class members have decided to opt in the settlement to get their benefits. On the completion of settlement, NuvaRing maker Merck & Co. has to provide refund of $1 million amount to claimants.
Many contraceptive pills are available in the market that helps you to stay away from unwanted pregnancies. But sometimes these contraceptive pills have fatal side effects that trigger your health and your potency. NuvaRing contraceptive Settlement has recently approved by U.S. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel of St. Louis as majority of the class members have decided to opt in the settlement to get their benefits. On the completion of settlement, NuvaRing maker Merck & Co. has to provide refund of $1 million amount to claimants.
Friday, May 30, 2014
How to claim Kobe Beef Class Action Settlement?
If you purchased item containing Kobe beef at Barney’s Beanery’s restaurant during the time period of October 3, 2008 and January 27, 2014, the claim to get refund from the Barney’s Beanery Kobe Beef Class Action Settlement.
Barney’s Beanery’s has settled a class-action lawsuit over the claims that the company mislead customers and falsely advertised the Kobe beef menu items in its online and in store menus. The company has agreed to pay compensation to class members for settling the class action lawsuit. California residents who bought a menu item containing “Kobe” beef at a Barney’s Beanery’s restaurant either online or in the store itself between October 3, 2008 and January 27, 2014, then they can get a refund from Barney’s Beanery Kobe Beef Class Action Settlement.
Barney’s Beanery’s has settled a class-action lawsuit over the claims that the company mislead customers and falsely advertised the Kobe beef menu items in its online and in store menus. The company has agreed to pay compensation to class members for settling the class action lawsuit. California residents who bought a menu item containing “Kobe” beef at a Barney’s Beanery’s restaurant either online or in the store itself between October 3, 2008 and January 27, 2014, then they can get a refund from Barney’s Beanery Kobe Beef Class Action Settlement.
Labels:
Consumer Fraud,
Food/Drink,
Health,
Media/Telecom,
overdraft
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















