Settlement Info blog gives info about latest class action lawsuit settlements currently in news. Learn to claim and settle to get back your refund on settlements.
Showing posts with label Consumer Fraud. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Consumer Fraud. Show all posts
Friday, May 1, 2015
Saturday, April 25, 2015
BevMo's Five Cent Sale Settlement over misleading statements
If you are eligible class member, you will receive a payment in the form of one or more Discount Coupons from the settlement at FiveCentSaleSettlement.com.
A settlement has been proposed with the Beverages & More Inc. According to the class action settlement the company made misleading statements about its 5 Cent Sale to the consumers of California. And due to this consumers believe that they were receiving a bigger than they in reality received. So, if you have purchased wine at BevMo’s 5 Cent Wine Sale during the Class Period, you can get benefits from this settlement.

Monday, March 2, 2015
How to claim Alltel Early Termination Fee (ETF) Settlement?
File your claim at AlltelETFSettlement.com and you will receive $70 per line on which an ETF was paid under the Rosenow v. Alltel Settlement.

Friday, February 6, 2015
TracFone Prepaid Phone Refund Settlement
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
Hofmann v. Permatex Settlement over inappropriately labeling
Thursday, January 22, 2015
How to claim Verizon Family SharePlan Class Action Settlement?
Claim Verizon Family SharePlan Class Action Settlement on verizonFSPclassaction.com as Verizon Wireless has settled a class-action lawsuit over Family Plan over-billing.
Verizon has agreed to settle a long-running class action lawsuit over Family Plan over-billing by paying $64.2 million. Those who were subscribed to Verizon Family SharePlan during the period of May 11, 2002 to May 10, 2006 and people who received a notice about the Verizon Family SharePlan Class Action Settlement via mail or email are the class members of the settlement.
Plaintiffs named Ralph Demmick and Donald Barth filed a class action lawsuit in 2006 against Verizon Wireless on behalf of other people with similar claims. They allege that the Verizon billed Family Share Plan customers for “In-Network” or “In-Family” calls that were supposed to be free under the plan. They further claim that company over-charged them for “after-allowance” minutes they used over their monthly allowance. Thus, Verizon violated its customer contracts as well as state and federal law.
Verizon has agreed to settle a long-running class action lawsuit over Family Plan over-billing by paying $64.2 million. Those who were subscribed to Verizon Family SharePlan during the period of May 11, 2002 to May 10, 2006 and people who received a notice about the Verizon Family SharePlan Class Action Settlement via mail or email are the class members of the settlement.
Plaintiffs named Ralph Demmick and Donald Barth filed a class action lawsuit in 2006 against Verizon Wireless on behalf of other people with similar claims. They allege that the Verizon billed Family Share Plan customers for “In-Network” or “In-Family” calls that were supposed to be free under the plan. They further claim that company over-charged them for “after-allowance” minutes they used over their monthly allowance. Thus, Verizon violated its customer contracts as well as state and federal law.
Thursday, December 11, 2014
Saini V BMW Settlement over Demo Vehicle
If you purchased a BMW between September 28, 2006 and October 6, 2014, then claim into the BMW Demo Vehicle Class Action Settlement at SainivBMWSettlement.com to get benefits.
Those who bought a “new” BMW vehicle within the time period of September 28, 2006 to before October 6, 2014, then it can be a demonstration car. BMW of North America has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit over Demo cars. The company will provide warranty extension and reimbursement for past expenses to all the class members of the BMW Demo Vehicle Class Action Settlement, who submit a valid claim form at SainivBMWSettlement.com.
Plaintiff named Sanjay Saini filed a class action lawsuit against BMW claiming that the company dealers sold sales demonstration ("sales demo") and Aftersales Mobility Program ("service demo") vehicles as New with an "ultimate warranty" without informing them the cars were demo cars. The dealers also informed to customer that the limited warranty for the vehicle had started before they purchased the vehicle. BMW denies these claims but agreed to end the lawsuit.
Those who bought a “new” BMW vehicle within the time period of September 28, 2006 to before October 6, 2014, then it can be a demonstration car. BMW of North America has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit over Demo cars. The company will provide warranty extension and reimbursement for past expenses to all the class members of the BMW Demo Vehicle Class Action Settlement, who submit a valid claim form at SainivBMWSettlement.com.
Plaintiff named Sanjay Saini filed a class action lawsuit against BMW claiming that the company dealers sold sales demonstration ("sales demo") and Aftersales Mobility Program ("service demo") vehicles as New with an "ultimate warranty" without informing them the cars were demo cars. The dealers also informed to customer that the limited warranty for the vehicle had started before they purchased the vehicle. BMW denies these claims but agreed to end the lawsuit.
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Miller V Pier 1 Imports Settlement over ZIP Code Collection
Pier 1 Imports customers who have paid via credit card and asked for personal details with zip code can get refund voucher at MillervPier1Settlement.com.
We never become suspicious if person situated at one of the most popular shopping shop’s counter ask for any personal details. But, it is not good to give your all personal details at any shopping place without questioning about why they want it and especially if they do not collect personal information in past. Pier 1 Imports has come across the class action because they have unlawfully collected personal information of their customers. If you have also shopped at Pier 1 Imports and have provided your personal information, then claim your refund into the Pier 1 Imports ZIP Code Class Action Settlement.
We never become suspicious if person situated at one of the most popular shopping shop’s counter ask for any personal details. But, it is not good to give your all personal details at any shopping place without questioning about why they want it and especially if they do not collect personal information in past. Pier 1 Imports has come across the class action because they have unlawfully collected personal information of their customers. If you have also shopped at Pier 1 Imports and have provided your personal information, then claim your refund into the Pier 1 Imports ZIP Code Class Action Settlement.
Friday, November 7, 2014
AT&T FTC Mobile Cramming Settlement for cramming charges
Current and former AT&T customers who were billed for unauthorized third-party services after January 1, 2009 can file a claim for a refund at www.FTC.gov/ATT.
The telecom giant AT&T has agreed to pay a hefty $105 million to settle the lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission over allegations that it charged mobile customers for third-party services without their consent. According to the lawsuit, AT&T engaged in the unfair trade practice of “cramming” and billed millions of customers for services like ringtones, wallpaper, and text messages of horoscope, celebrity gossip or flirting tips, which they never subscribed. Moreover, AT&T even attempted to hide those unauthorized charges (typically $9.99 a month) on customer’s bill by stating them as “AT&T Monthly Subscriptions”.
The telecom giant AT&T has agreed to pay a hefty $105 million to settle the lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission over allegations that it charged mobile customers for third-party services without their consent. According to the lawsuit, AT&T engaged in the unfair trade practice of “cramming” and billed millions of customers for services like ringtones, wallpaper, and text messages of horoscope, celebrity gossip or flirting tips, which they never subscribed. Moreover, AT&T even attempted to hide those unauthorized charges (typically $9.99 a month) on customer’s bill by stating them as “AT&T Monthly Subscriptions”.
Thursday, October 30, 2014
AT&T to settle alleged data throttling in unlimited data plans
The Federal Trade Commission has filed a lawsuit against AT&T alleging the company has deceived its unlimited data plan customers by throttling their data speeds.
Cell phone giant AT&T has been charged by the Federal Trade Commission with allegations of misleading millions of smartphone customers over ‘unlimited’ data plans. In a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, the FTC accused the wireless carrier of slowing down the data speeds of unlimited data customers dramatically once they exceeded a certain amount of usage. According to the FTC, AT&T has throttled over 3.5 million unlimited data customers without notifying them properly. In some worst cases, the data speeds were reduced by as much as 90 percent.
Cell phone giant AT&T has been charged by the Federal Trade Commission with allegations of misleading millions of smartphone customers over ‘unlimited’ data plans. In a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, the FTC accused the wireless carrier of slowing down the data speeds of unlimited data customers dramatically once they exceeded a certain amount of usage. According to the FTC, AT&T has throttled over 3.5 million unlimited data customers without notifying them properly. In some worst cases, the data speeds were reduced by as much as 90 percent.
Friday, October 10, 2014
HP Inkjet Printer Settlement 2014
HP has agreed to settle the HP Inkjet Printer class action lawsuits by providing coupons worth $2 to $6 to class members. Claim on hpinkjetprintersettlement.com.
A 7-years old dispute comes to an end as a California federal judge has approved HP Inkjet Printer class action settlement. The HP Inkjet Printer Settlement includes three different class action lawsuits alleging similar claims against the Hewlett-Packard Company (HP). All the three lawsuits claimed that HP misled consumers about its inkjet printer ink cartridges and when they needed to be replaced. HP refuses these claims but agreed to settle the lawsuits.
A 7-years old dispute comes to an end as a California federal judge has approved HP Inkjet Printer class action settlement. The HP Inkjet Printer Settlement includes three different class action lawsuits alleging similar claims against the Hewlett-Packard Company (HP). All the three lawsuits claimed that HP misled consumers about its inkjet printer ink cartridges and when they needed to be replaced. HP refuses these claims but agreed to settle the lawsuits.
ZaaZoom Electronic check scheme Settlement over allegedly money withdraw
Individual charged for Zaazoom membership program without any consent can get $11 refund in ZaaZoom Electronic check scheme Settlement at FNBCTSettlement.com.
Zaazoom offers online membership programs to offer you all e-commerce related information as well as news that are happening all around the world. Once you become a part of Zaazoom membership program’s part and create remote check on your name, you will be charged with fees. Zaazoom will ask for your bank details to get fees payment online from your account. But, zaazoom has failed to provide secure services to their customers as they have tried to withdraw money from your account without asking for your permission for membership programs. If you also have come across this kind of fraud from zaazoom, then claim your refund into the ZaaZoom Electronic check scheme Settlement.
Zaazoom offers online membership programs to offer you all e-commerce related information as well as news that are happening all around the world. Once you become a part of Zaazoom membership program’s part and create remote check on your name, you will be charged with fees. Zaazoom will ask for your bank details to get fees payment online from your account. But, zaazoom has failed to provide secure services to their customers as they have tried to withdraw money from your account without asking for your permission for membership programs. If you also have come across this kind of fraud from zaazoom, then claim your refund into the ZaaZoom Electronic check scheme Settlement.
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
$1.6M Lowe's 2×4 labeling settlement
Monday, September 22, 2014
How to claim for ING Rate Renewal Settlement?
If you got an Orange Mortgage or Easy Orange Mortgage from ING Bank between October 1, 2005 and May 31, 2009, or you performed a Rate Renewal of your ING Orange Mortgage during this period, you may be entitled to settlement benefits.
Multiple class action lawsuits have been filed against ING Bank in which the plaintiffs allege that ING wrongly marketed its Orange Mortgage and Easy Orange Mortgages as having “Rate Renew Guarantee”. The Rate Renewal feature promised that borrowers could renew their interest rates on ING Easy Orange and ING Orange loans for a flat charge of $500 or $750 at any time during the life of the loan. But according to plaintiffs, ING not only violated the law by raising the Rate Renewal fee but also refused to give some borrowers the option of Rate Renewal. Although ING has denied any wrongdoing, they have agreed to a class action settlement to resolve the litigation.
Multiple class action lawsuits have been filed against ING Bank in which the plaintiffs allege that ING wrongly marketed its Orange Mortgage and Easy Orange Mortgages as having “Rate Renew Guarantee”. The Rate Renewal feature promised that borrowers could renew their interest rates on ING Easy Orange and ING Orange loans for a flat charge of $500 or $750 at any time during the life of the loan. But according to plaintiffs, ING not only violated the law by raising the Rate Renewal fee but also refused to give some borrowers the option of Rate Renewal. Although ING has denied any wrongdoing, they have agreed to a class action settlement to resolve the litigation.
Claim KitchenAid Mixer Settlement on MixerSettlement.com
Class members of the KitchenAid Stand Mixer Horsepower Class Action Settlement can access MixerSettlement.com to get each and every detail regarding the settlement.
The stand mixer is among the most popular kitchen appliances. If you have a KitchenAid stand mixer, then you may be eligible for compensation from KitchenAid Stand Mixer Horsepower Class Action Settlement. To get benefits, you must have purchased or received a Mixer as a gift before June 18, 2014. All the details about the settlement are available at MixerSettlement.com.
Plaintiff filed a case against Whirlpool who manufactures KitchenAid-brand stand mixers claiming that it provided wrong information about the horsepower of some of its KitchenAid brand stand mixers. The company overstated the horsepower and thereby violated various consumer protection statutes and the express written warranties. Although Whirlpool refuses these allegations, it agreed to settle the class action lawsuit for avoiding further expenses.
The stand mixer is among the most popular kitchen appliances. If you have a KitchenAid stand mixer, then you may be eligible for compensation from KitchenAid Stand Mixer Horsepower Class Action Settlement. To get benefits, you must have purchased or received a Mixer as a gift before June 18, 2014. All the details about the settlement are available at MixerSettlement.com.
Plaintiff filed a case against Whirlpool who manufactures KitchenAid-brand stand mixers claiming that it provided wrong information about the horsepower of some of its KitchenAid brand stand mixers. The company overstated the horsepower and thereby violated various consumer protection statutes and the express written warranties. Although Whirlpool refuses these allegations, it agreed to settle the class action lawsuit for avoiding further expenses.
Friday, August 15, 2014
Truvia Sweetener Lawsuit Settlement over false-advertising
Customers who have purchased Truvia Natural Sweetener between July 1, 2008 and July 24, 2014 can claim into the Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement on TruviaSweetenerLawsuit.com to get cash refund or vouchers.
Many people throughout the United States use Truvia Natural Sweeteners thinking that they are made with all natural ingredients. But they will be shocked to know that those sweeteners actually contain highly processed ingredients instead of natural. If you have purchased the Truvia Natural Sweetener (packet, spoonable jar and baking blend forms) for household or personal use between July 1, 2008 and July 24, 2014, then you are eligible to get cash refund or vouchers from the Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement.
Two class action lawsuits (Denise Howerton, et al. v. Cargill, Inc. and Molly Martin and Lauren Barry v. Cargill, Inc.) were filed against Cargill claiming that it misled customers by marketing its Truvia consumer products as “natural”. According to plaintiffs, the Truvia Natural Sweeteners are not natural as they contain highly processed ingredients and/or ingredients derived from GMOs (genetically modified organisms).
They further claimed that the descriptions of products were inaccurate or misleading. Thus, the company violated consumer protection laws and the breach-of-warranty laws of various states (Minnesota, California, Hawaii, and Florida). Cargill denies all these allegations but agreed to pay $5 million to settle these class action lawsuits. The company will also make certain changes to the labels of its Truvia Natural Sweetener products.
Many people throughout the United States use Truvia Natural Sweeteners thinking that they are made with all natural ingredients. But they will be shocked to know that those sweeteners actually contain highly processed ingredients instead of natural. If you have purchased the Truvia Natural Sweetener (packet, spoonable jar and baking blend forms) for household or personal use between July 1, 2008 and July 24, 2014, then you are eligible to get cash refund or vouchers from the Truvia Natural Sweetener Class Action Settlement.
Two class action lawsuits (Denise Howerton, et al. v. Cargill, Inc. and Molly Martin and Lauren Barry v. Cargill, Inc.) were filed against Cargill claiming that it misled customers by marketing its Truvia consumer products as “natural”. According to plaintiffs, the Truvia Natural Sweeteners are not natural as they contain highly processed ingredients and/or ingredients derived from GMOs (genetically modified organisms).
They further claimed that the descriptions of products were inaccurate or misleading. Thus, the company violated consumer protection laws and the breach-of-warranty laws of various states (Minnesota, California, Hawaii, and Florida). Cargill denies all these allegations but agreed to pay $5 million to settle these class action lawsuits. The company will also make certain changes to the labels of its Truvia Natural Sweetener products.
Thursday, August 14, 2014
How to File claim for comScore Data Collection Settlement?
Learn how to file a claim for ComScore Privacy Class Action Settlement at DataCollectionSettlement.net to get monetary benefits of about $200.
ComScore has decided to end the three years long class action lawsuit for privacy violations. The company will pay $14 million as compensation to affected customers. All the people who had downloaded and installed comScore’s software on their computer and used it for interstate commerce and/or communication between January 01, 2005 and May 30, 2014 are the class members of this privacy class action settlement. Class members have to submit a claim form to get monetary benefits from the ComScore Privacy Class Action Settlement.
ComScore has decided to end the three years long class action lawsuit for privacy violations. The company will pay $14 million as compensation to affected customers. All the people who had downloaded and installed comScore’s software on their computer and used it for interstate commerce and/or communication between January 01, 2005 and May 30, 2014 are the class members of this privacy class action settlement. Class members have to submit a claim form to get monetary benefits from the ComScore Privacy Class Action Settlement.
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
Wells Fargo Fladell Settlement for false property insurance
Claim Wells Fargo Force-Placed Insurance Class Action Settlement on fladellsettlementinfo.com to get cash reimbursement from the settlement.
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Assurant Inc. and QBE Insurance Group have agreed to pay $32 million to resolve the ongoing class action lawsuit, alleging that homeowners were overcharged for forced-placed insurance. Class members who received a Settlement Notice Packet via mail can get cash reimbursement from the Wells Fargo Force-Placed Insurance Class Action Settlement by submitting the claim form.
Plaintiffs sued the defendants claiming that the Wells Fargo Defendants placed insurance in such a way that they received an unauthorized benefit. Plaintiffs also claimed that the Wells Fargo Defendants also got kickbacks in the form of commissions from the Assurant Defendants and QBE Defendants.
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Assurant Inc. and QBE Insurance Group have agreed to pay $32 million to resolve the ongoing class action lawsuit, alleging that homeowners were overcharged for forced-placed insurance. Class members who received a Settlement Notice Packet via mail can get cash reimbursement from the Wells Fargo Force-Placed Insurance Class Action Settlement by submitting the claim form.
Plaintiffs sued the defendants claiming that the Wells Fargo Defendants placed insurance in such a way that they received an unauthorized benefit. Plaintiffs also claimed that the Wells Fargo Defendants also got kickbacks in the form of commissions from the Assurant Defendants and QBE Defendants.
Monday, July 28, 2014
NYC Tour Bus Settlement for Price Fixing
Every NYC tour bus riders, who have overcharged for "hop on, hop off" service by Gray Line/CitySights, can claim $20 refund at TourBusSettlement.com.
Sometimes knowingly or unknowingly, big companies do fraud with their customer’s trust that leads them to frustrate with several dates of court cases. Recently, riders of New York City tour bus companies has been come across the lawsuit due to overcharging their customers and with hole in their most prominent “hop-on, hop-off” service. NYC tour bus companies has been agreed to settle down class action. Go through the NYC Tour Bus Settlement for finding out eligibility and claiming procedure.
Sometimes knowingly or unknowingly, big companies do fraud with their customer’s trust that leads them to frustrate with several dates of court cases. Recently, riders of New York City tour bus companies has been come across the lawsuit due to overcharging their customers and with hole in their most prominent “hop-on, hop-off” service. NYC tour bus companies has been agreed to settle down class action. Go through the NYC Tour Bus Settlement for finding out eligibility and claiming procedure.
Monday, July 21, 2014
How to Claim Vendini Settlement for Data Breach?
Vendini users who have booked tickets and come across identity theft issue can claim their refund in Vendini data breach settlement at VendiniSettlement.com.
It has become a normal procedure that we provide our personal details whenever we do any online transactions or book tickets on internet. As we are interacting with trusted sources, we never think that those trusted sources can also take disadvantages of our trust and reveal our vital important information. Same situation has aroused for the Vendini customers. As per claims of many customers, company has disclosed their personal information increasing the threat of being cheated while online transaction. If you also have come across the same situation, then you can claim your refund into the Vendini data breach class action settlement.
It has become a normal procedure that we provide our personal details whenever we do any online transactions or book tickets on internet. As we are interacting with trusted sources, we never think that those trusted sources can also take disadvantages of our trust and reveal our vital important information. Same situation has aroused for the Vendini customers. As per claims of many customers, company has disclosed their personal information increasing the threat of being cheated while online transaction. If you also have come across the same situation, then you can claim your refund into the Vendini data breach class action settlement.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















